Review of CSS Officers (Under Secretary) under FR 56 (j) and Rule 48 of CSS (Pension) Rules, 1972
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
(Department of Personnel & Training)
Lok Nayak Bhawan, New Delhi-110003
Dated 20th July, 2021
Subject: Review of CSS Officers (Under Secretary) under FR 56 (j) and Rule 48 of CSS (Pension) Rules, 1972 — Request for information — regarding
In terms of the instructions contained in DoPT’s O.M. No.25012/03/2019- Estt.A.IV dated 28th August, 2020 read with O.M. No.25013/1/2013-Estt (A.IV) dated 11.09.2015 and related instructions, the undersigned is directed to inform that information/ complete inputs are required for review under FR 56(j) and Rule 48 of CSS (Pension) Rules 1972 in DoP&T in respect of Under Secretary level officer of CSS of Ministries/ Departments, who have crossed the age of 50 years on 01.07.2021.
2. The above-mentioned data/inputs may be provided in the 15 column prescribed proforma (copy enclosed), in hard copy or through email address at [email protected] The soft copy of the inputs may also please be sent at the said email address in the excel format only, as per the attached proforma. (other format like pdf, word etc are not required).
3. It may also be ensured that no column of the proforma is left blank. It may also be ensured that the inputs of the Ministry/Department may be communicated at an appropriate level, with the name, designation, mail-id and telephone number of the officer clearly indicated so that it is easy to follow up with the Department, in case of any further clarification.
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India
Email id- [email protected]
|S.No.||Min/Dept||Name of the officer to be reviewed
|CSL No.||Designation||D.O.B.||Age as on 01.07.2021||Date since holding the post in the current designation||Leave avalied during the past five years (from the service ook)||State of health and whether it has a bearing on diischarge of duties and if yes, please elabborate.||Whether services of the officer are considered useful to the Government||Whether the officer is considered competent and effictive and fit to continue to hold the post occupied?||Is there any reasion to dubt the Integrity viz. Complaints of suspicious transaction in property, corruption, informal feedback etc. Please specify||Penalties if any Imposed on officer during the entire career||Overall conduct of the officer and remarks, if any|