Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP)-7th Pay Commission Report
Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP):
i. This will continue to be administered at 10, 20 and 30 years as before.
ii. In the new Pay matrix, the employees will move to the immediate next level in the hierarchy.
iii. In the interest of improving performance level, the benchmark for MACP has been recommended to be enhanced from ‘Good’ to ‘Very Good.’
iv. The Commission has proposed withholding of annual increments in the case of those employees who are not able to meet the benchmark either for MACP or a regular promotion within the first 20 years of their service. (paras 5.1.44-5.1.46)
Withholding Annual Increments of Non-performers after 20 Years
There is a widespread perception that increments as well as upward movement in the hierarchy happen as a matter of course. The perception is that grant of MACP, although subject to the employee attaining the laid down threshold of performance, is taken for granted. This Commission believes that employees who do not meet the laid down performance criterion should not be allowed to earn future annual increments. The Commission is therefore proposing withholding of annual increments in the case of those employees who are not able to meet the benchmark either for MACP or a regular promotion within the first 20 years of their service.
This will act as a deterrent for complacent and inefficient employees. However, since this is not a penalty, the norms for penal action in disciplinary cases involving withholding increments will not be applicable in such cases. This will be treated as an “efficiency bar”. Additionally, for such employees there could be an option to leave service on similar terms and conditions as prescribed for voluntary retirement.
ABHIJIT KUMAR SEN says
Rly accounts assistant who has joined as accounts clerk, has now ended in gp rs 4600, and getting less salary than the persons who has joined as jaa in the same year or passed appendixII exam in the same year, these jaas are ending in gp 4800. Hence in the light of equality, former persons should end in gp 4800.
In rly, who has appeared in appendixIII exam in accounts department but failed to pass due to short marks in one subject, specially in with books subject, and demanding reassessment of their failed paper are not now allowed by the rly bd. As there is no restriction on the reassessment of such claimed paper by the candidate for reassessment, hence govt should instruct the rly bd to reassess such paper who has claimed to do so, and full marks should be awarded to such candidates who has written as per code specially in with books paper. There are some orders of RTI authority on rly bd on this matter which they are denying to do only to gag the promotion of some group c accounts assistant. Govt should look after such cases sympathetically and logically.
Prakash R Jani says
Sir we are change our department on required ment of
Officially in same gread pay scale
What about macp we are getting or not
khushhalchandbhagat says
Ppo 430530000900 it is veri much pitty my colleagues enjoyed the benefit of ACP in 2000 my name was left out of the eligible list delibratly out of redtape I retired on 31-12-2000 as EA to SE(E)coordinationCPWD want some action
mihir singh says
Sir mera bacic 8130 gp
1800 mera 7th CPC mera new salery kitna hoga
mihir singh says
Sir mera bacic 8130 go 1800 mera 7th CPC mera new salery kitna hoga