• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Geod.in Employees News

Geod.in

  • Home
  • PAY MATRIX
  • 7th CPC Pay
  • EXPECTED DA
  • LTC 80 Fare
  • AICPIN
  • DOPT
  • Finmin
  • Get e-mail
    • About Us

Always Popular

7th CPC Pay Matrix7th CPC Pay Calculator
8th CPC NewsTNEB Code List
6th CPC Fitment TableCGHS Rate list 2024
Expected DA July 2024AFD CSD Online Portal
AICPIN October 2024 New7th CPC CEA Form New
KV Fees 2023House Rent Form

REVISION OF PENSION OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERS FROM 1ST JANUARY 2006 – HON’BLE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT

Admin March 26, 2015

ARREARS WEF 01.01.06 MATTER- JUDGMENT/ ORDER OF THE HSC IN THE SLP- CA CASES IS AS FOLLOWS:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.(S). 8875-8876 OF 2011

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

VINOD KUMAR JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

C.A. No.1998 of 2012,

C.A.No.3564 of 2012,

C.A.No.3907 of 2012,

C.A.No.4581 of 2012,

C.A.No.4952 of 2012,

C.A.No.4980 of 2012,

C.A.No.4599 of 2013,

C.A.No.1 of 2015

AND

SLP(C)Nos.36148-36150 of 2013,

SLP(C)No.16780-16782 of 2014 &

SLP(C)No……… of 2015 (CC Nos.16903-16904)

O R D E R

Heard.

Delay condoned.

C.A.Nos.8875-76 of 2011, C.A. No.1998 of 2012, C.A.No.3564 of 2012, C.A.No.3907 of 2012, C.A.No.4581 of 2012, C.A.No.4952 of 2012, C.A.No.4980 of 2012:
We see no reason to interfere with the orders impugned.

The civil appeals are accordingly dismissed.
C.A.No.4599 of 2013, C.A.No.1 of 2015 :

No substantial question of law of general/public importance arises for our consideration in these applications for leave to appeal.

The prayer for leave to appeal is accordingly declined and the applications for leave to appeal dismissed.

SLP(C)Nos.36148-36150 of 2013

SLP(C)No.16780-16782 of 2014& SLP(C)Nos………..of 2015 (CC Nos.16903-16904):

We see no reason to interfere with the orders impugned.

The special leave petitions are accordingly dismissed.

Ms. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General,
however submits that in view of the nature of the controversy as also the extent of financial burden arising out of the implementation of the impugned orders, the petitioners-U.O.I.
may be given reasonable time to do the needful. That prayer is not opposed by counsel opposite.

We accordingly grant four months’ time from today to the petitioners to comply with the impugned orders failing which the contempt petitions pending before the Tribunal can be revived by the concerned petitioners and taken to their logical conclusion.
All impleading and intervention applications are also dismissed.
…………………..J

(T.S. THAKUR)

…………………..J

(R. BANUMATHI)

NEW DELHI

DATED 17th March, 2015.

source-http://scm-bps.blogspot.in/2015/03/arrears-wef-010106-matter-judgment.html

Filed Under: Central Government Employees News, Pension

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Recent Comments

  • GTA SA MOD on Pay Matrix Chhattisgarh
  • Shankar on 7th Pay Commission Pay Matrix Table
  • Mp3 Juice on Pay Matrix Gujarat

Primary Sidebar

Search Box

Quick Links

7th CPC Pay Calculator

AFD CSD Price 2023

NPS Withdrawal Form

CGHS Rate 2023

CGHS Claim Form

CGHS Card Form

KV Fees 2023-2024

KV Uniforms 2023-24

KV Result – Search Box

KV School List

7th CPC Salary Calculator

Pay Calculator Karnataka

Pay Matrix Tables

4th,5th,6th & 7th Pay Scale

6th CPC Fitment Table

Civilian Employees

Teachers & Professor

Defence Force

Military MNS

GDS Pay Matrix

Assam

Bihar

Chhattisgarh

Gujarat

Haryana

Jammu & Kashmir

Jharkhand

Karnataka

Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra

Manipur

Meghalaya

Mizoram

Nagaland

Odisha

Rajasthan

Sikkim

Tamil Nadu

Tripura

Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand

West Bengal

Other Topics

TNEB Distribution Code

Holidays 2023 

Sports Calendar 2022-2023

Copyright © 2025 · Central Government Employees & Pensioners News - Geod.in - Log in