CPAO Order – Implementation of Government’s decision on the recommendations of 7th Central Pay Commission – Revision of pension of pre- 2016 Pensioners/ Family Pensioners, etc
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE
CENTRAL PENSION ACCOUNTING OFFICE
TRIKOOT-II.BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE,
NEW DELHI-110066
CPAO/IT&Tech/Revision(7thCPC)/19.Vol-III(C)/2016-17/143
03.11.2017
Office Memorandum
Subject: – Implementation of Government’s decision on the recommendations of 7th Central Pay Commission – Revision of pension of pre- 2016 Pensioners/ Family Pensioners, etc.-reg.
DP&PW vide OM No. 38/37/2016-P&PW (A) dated-12.05.2017 on the above subject had issued detailed instructions to all concerned to revise the pensions of pre-2016 pensioners/ family pensioners. But while issuing instructions to PAOs vide CPAOs OM No. CPAO /IT& Tech/ Revision (7th CPC)/ 19 Vol-III/2016-17/37 dated-25.05.2017 inadvertently an important point “that these orders would not be applicable for the purpose of revision of pension of those pensioners who were drawing compulsory retirement pension under Rule 40 of the CCS (Pension) Rules or compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules. The pensioners in these categories would continue to be entitled to get revised pension in accordance with the instructions contained in DP&PW O.M. No. 38/37/2016-P&PW(A)(ii) dated 04.08.2016” was missed.
Consequently, it has been noticed that some Ministries/Departments have revised the pensions of pensioners who were drawing compulsory retirement pension under Rule 40 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 or Compassionate allowance under 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules also and sent to CPAO. These cases are to be returned to the concerned PAOs by CPAO.
In view of the above, to avoid any further problems arising out of it, all Pr. CCAs/CCAs/ CAs/ AGs/ Administrators of UPS are requested to instruct their PAOs not to revise such cases.
This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
(Md. Shahid Kamal Ansari)
(Asstt. Controller of Accounts
S.mani says
REGARDING PAYPARITY FOR
Y GROUP SUBADARS IN TABLE 7.
Dear sir several times It has been indicatted regarding OROP pay parity in Table 7
same rank same grade same service in Table 9 is getting more pension then table 7. why this pay parity and demoralize the regular army subedars ,. Subadars are controling the compay with compay commander in the regular army
then why shoud this pay parity. Pl check OROP TABLE 7 and 9 and take decission like good judge and judgement.,pl dont hurt the regular army subadars ,who all are in the regular army retaired soldiers . I hope the govt will take good judgement for regular army retaired subadars and will not hurt to subadars retaired , pl compare the pay parity in table 7 and 9 give good judgement. for y group subadar as it is in Table 9 y group subadare.. Every time we could not go to court . So u please give good judgement .for regular army subadrs retaired.
Thanking u in an antici pation
with regards
s.mani
145710 y subadar